3-11 July 2007
Merida, Mexico
Mexico/General timezone
Home > Timetable > Session details > Contribution details

Contribution Poster

Merida, Mexico - Regency (Hyatt)

Lateral distribution and the energy determination of showers along the ankle

Speakers

  • Mr. Germán ROS

Primary authors

  • Mr. Germán ROS (Space Plasmas and Astroparticle Group, Universidad de Alcalá, Pza. San Diego, s/n, 28801 Alcalá de Henares (Madrid), Spain)

Co-authors

  • Dr. Gustavo MEDINA TANCO (Dep. Altas Energías, Inst. de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México DF, CP 04510)
  • Mrs. Cinzia DE DONATO (Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Università di Milano and Sezione INFN, via Celoria 16, I-20133)
  • Dr. Luis DEL PERAL (Space Plasmas and Astroparticle Group, Universidad de Alcalá, Pza. San Diego, s/n, 28801 Alcalá de Henares (Madrid), Spain)
  • Dr. Dolores RODRÍGUEZ FRÍAS (Space Plasmas and Astroparticle Group, Universidad de Alcalá, Pza. San Diego, s/n, 28801 Alcalá de Henares (Madrid), Spain)
  • Dr. Juan Carlos D'OLIVO (Dep. Altas Energías, Inst. de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México DF, CP 04510)
  • Dr. José F. VALDES-GALICIA (Inst. de Geofisica. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México DF, CP 04510)

Abstract content

The normalization constant of the lateral distribution function (LDF) of an extensive air shower is a monotonous (almost linear) increasing function of the energy of the primary, as well as a monotonous decreasing function of the distance from the shower core. Therefore, the interpolated signal at some fixed distance from the core can be calibrated to estimate the energy of the shower. There is, somehow surprisingly, a reconstructed optimal distance, r_opt, at which the effects on the inferred signal, S(r_opt), of the uncertainties on true core location, LDF functional form and shower-to-shower fluctuations are minimized. We calculate the value of r_opt and study the robustness of the method as a function of surface detector separation (400 m to 1500 m), energy (0.1 EeV to 10 EeV) and zenith angle (0 to 60 deg) for a realistic distribution of core determination errors along the space parameter used. We also investigate the effects of silent and saturated stations and give a rough estimate of the systematic errors introduced by varying cosmic ray composition inside the considered energy range.

Reference

Proceedings of the 30th International Cosmic Ray Conference; Rogelio Caballero, Juan Carlos D'Olivo, Gustavo Medina-Tanco, Lukas Nellen, Federico A. Sánchez, José F. Valdés-Galicia (eds.); Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico, 2008; Vol. 4 (HE part 1), pages 243-246